tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4155001848132397833.post5465071301710243486..comments2023-09-18T06:46:37.144-07:00Comments on IDIOT- 1. an utterly foolish or senseless person. 2. a fool, half-wit; imbecile; dolt, dun: REASON 2,542 WE DESPISE LIBERAL DEMOCRATS. Listen To The Douchebag Democrat Al Franken, The 'Accidental' Senator, Shut Down Lieberman On House Floor..Idiots For Obamahttp://www.blogger.com/profile/05712350448324596786noreply@blogger.comBlogger8125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4155001848132397833.post-72468544920317136182009-12-19T10:33:59.335-08:002009-12-19T10:33:59.335-08:00You're are an idiot though. It's not name ...You're are an idiot though. It's not name calling, it's fact. And I anser my questions without using name calling as an answer. I guess you're too slow to get that part..<br /><br />Dude, you have to stop using fact check. Obama's so down woth Annenburg who runs fact check so spare me. You do know you're like, one of seven people in America who do not know this right?<br /Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4155001848132397833.post-63035053076241473522009-12-19T09:41:48.593-08:002009-12-19T09:41:48.593-08:00"Why should the US Taxpayer provide abortions..."Why should the US Taxpayer provide abortions for people?"<br /><br />If it was ever in health care reform it's out as of today. It was taken out to get Ben Nelson on board for the Senate version. Looks like it was a successful compromise.<br /><br />Or Illegal aliens? <br /><br />"H.R. 3200: Sec 246 — NO FEDERAL PAYMENT FOR UNDOCUMENTED ALIENS Nothing in this subtitle shall Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4155001848132397833.post-89226377211175998602009-12-19T09:12:10.451-08:002009-12-19T09:12:10.451-08:00hey anonymous. if democrats voted to make rape ...hey anonymous. if democrats voted to make rape 'legal' and the republicans said 'no' and tried to stop it, your dumbass would call them the party of 'no' and said that they could of been part of history. that's how fucking dumb you sound!<br /><br />providing health care to all Americans is NOT the responsibility of the government. It's NOT in the constitution. theAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4155001848132397833.post-27741548678186356992009-12-18T20:11:39.861-08:002009-12-18T20:11:39.861-08:00Well, it's time for Hardball Politics. The Rep...Well, it's time for Hardball Politics. The Republicans would have done it, too. They had a chance to be a part of history. They could have worked with the Democrats. They chose not to. OK<br /><br />They're not in power. Sucks to be them. <br /><br />Fine, be a Losertarian. The Libertarian Party has been around for 30 years and have NOTHING to show for it.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4155001848132397833.post-57024702006956626762009-12-18T18:47:49.729-08:002009-12-18T18:47:49.729-08:00Mr Liberal probably believes Franken honestly won ...Mr Liberal probably believes Franken honestly won the election the democrats stole from rep. Norm Coleman. Thise boxes of votes in the trunk of that car just happened to be overlooked.<br /><br />What makes me sick to my core is that liberals defend a party that intentionally discarded overseas ballots from men and women from Minn. serving in Iraq and Afghanastan who voted for Coleman by finding SKIPnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4155001848132397833.post-4929514774915970742009-12-18T18:23:58.713-08:002009-12-18T18:23:58.713-08:00Actually, you're wrong AND you're missing ...Actually, you're wrong AND you're missing the point. Al Franken could of let Lieberman speak for a few minutes as a courtesy and the point of this artice is that it was retribution , no matter how you dumbasses try to slice it. <br /><br />It was Al Frankens call to make. It doesn't matter what the other dickhead said. If this was a liberal democrat who wasn't against the public Nicknoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4155001848132397833.post-45056776046928048382009-12-18T15:03:02.047-08:002009-12-18T15:03:02.047-08:00Extending the time wasn't Franken's call t...Extending the time wasn't Franken's call to make. Specific instructions from Senate leadership limited debate to 10 minutes.<br /><br />Opponents are doing anything and everything to stonewall this legislation. <br /><br />Well, the answer is no.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4155001848132397833.post-34007932242557626982009-12-17T20:19:03.498-08:002009-12-17T20:19:03.498-08:00thanks for the video, it's now posted.thanks for the video, it's now posted.Idiots For Obamahttps://www.blogger.com/profile/05712350448324596786noreply@blogger.com