tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4155001848132397833.post6163723431756140854..comments2023-09-18T06:46:37.144-07:00Comments on IDIOT- 1. an utterly foolish or senseless person. 2. a fool, half-wit; imbecile; dolt, dun: OUCH! 'RINO' Susan Collins slams Obama administration on EunuchBomber handlingIdiots For Obamahttp://www.blogger.com/profile/05712350448324596786noreply@blogger.comBlogger3125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4155001848132397833.post-16730440069268483102010-02-03T08:22:06.018-08:002010-02-03T08:22:06.018-08:00Shawn -- sorry. But wishing it so doesn't make...Shawn -- sorry. But wishing it so doesn't make it so. Those constitutional rights apply to non-citizens too. Even Scalia, Thomas, and Alito think so.Peterhttp://blogs.geniocity.com/friedman/noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4155001848132397833.post-44565142866185383952010-02-02T16:18:51.527-08:002010-02-02T16:18:51.527-08:00I totally disagree. Timothy McVeigh was a United S...I totally disagree. Timothy McVeigh was a United States citizen and resident and deserves the rights by the US constitution. <br /><br />What you libertarians are missing...or if you are a retarded liberal...is that the Christmas bomber was NOT a US Citizen. <br /><br />There's a difference between McVeigh bombing a federal building as an angry US Citizen protesting the government- and he'Shawnnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4155001848132397833.post-3029046605547686002010-02-02T11:30:12.240-08:002010-02-02T11:30:12.240-08:00Conservatives? Collins idiotically argues the Cons...Conservatives? Collins idiotically argues the Constitution does not apply to non-citizens. The Supreme Court made explicit since 1886 (Yick Wo v. Hopkins) that it does. The 4 dissents in Boumediene in 2008 didn't even argue the Constitution doesn't apply to non-citizens -- the issue in that case was whether Gitmo is within the U.S., not whether the detainees there would have been Peterhttp://blogs.geniocity.com/friedman/noreply@blogger.com