Wednesday, October 14, 2009

Drew Sharp can't back up racist statements by Limbaugh. No one can...where is the evidence? Anyone? SHARPTON LIES-Video


If you watch the video closely, you will see the black commentator actually nods and agrees OR he isn't bothered by Rush Limbaughs comment or the explanation of his comment about McNabb. As for Drew Sharp, he can't even name where he's seen or heard the comments and thinks because of a few 'soundbites,' Limbaugh should be banned! How dumb is that?

People on the left are good at just 'making up shit' and boy does it stick..It's too bad we have so many 'dumbed down' sheep who just see it and believe it, without actually hearing it and we assure you, if it isn't on the internet, chances are it didn't happen.


What Sharpton fails to point out is that the black NFL players and team owners are against Rush BECAUSE of statements that he didn't make!! They were basing their decision to boycott and shut out Rush on statements that don't exist, or were taken out of context. This might be a 'lynching' because Rush is a conservative..

4 comments:

  1. Lol, you said it. If you watch Steven Crowder's investigation into Berkely College(sp*), which can be found on YouTube or PJTV.com, you'll actually hear students, at a very liberal leaning institution, tell a professor that they will believe what he says, despite not being presented with any facts. This is not taken out of context, it is a serious discussion in said class and the rest of the class (including the professor) respond accordingly...f'in sad

    ReplyDelete
  2. i thought he said those things. wow, guess he got a bad rap, that sucks. it's a shame after MSNBC laid into him for those comments, and no one can find them. i looked, but only the Mcnabb abd the crips and they weren't that bad IF you listened to the whole segment. another attack on a 'WHITE MALE CONSERVATIVE' what else is new. Jay Z gets a free pass I see.

    ReplyDelete
  3. The only comment I saw taken out of context was the bloods and the crypts comment. He was talking about how a player had a flag thrown because of his trash talk, which cost the team 15 yards, and incidentally the game. He was basically trying to talk about how much rivalry there was.

    His comment WAS offensive. He didn't see why at the time, and I don't think he was trying to be hateful towards the black players, simply pointing out that the game was heated. He could have said it was like another two gangs, but EVERYONE knows who the bloods and the crypts are, so he went with those words.

    The thing is though, the bloods and the crypts are a very sensitive subject for inner city people who have had to deal with that violence. It just so happens to be, statistically, the majority of people he offended in this light are black.

    So while I don't condone the words he chose, I also don't condone places like MSNBC taking that information and running with it.

    There are plenty of negative comments Rush has made about blacks, and it seems they outnumber the positive ones.

    ReplyDelete
  4. The more I have read, I have come to my opinion, in that Rush was used through his love of the NFL. Two facts that are documented (in an article on Bloomberg.com) have led me to this. In 2003, Dave Checketts and his "partner", George Soros' private equity firm, Soros Asset Management Group, bid and lost an attempt to buy the L.A. Dodgers. In 2006 these two, the group then known as Towerbrook Capital Partners, bid and bought the NHL's St. Louis Blues. It has now been rumored that Soros might be the majority financier in the Ram (NFL) bid. Also remember that Checketts approached Rush about the Ram bid. There is plenty more afoot here that hasn't been brought to light.

    ReplyDelete