Thursday, March 25, 2010

Corrupt Democrat Jim Clyburn: Health Care Opponents Aiding Terrorism. Huh?!?


This is the U.S. House Majority Whip Jim Clyburn Who Believes the “Constitution Mandates” His Corrupt Behavior.

At a Chamber of Commerce event in South Carolina, U.S. House Majority Whip Jim Clyburn said it was his “Constitutional Mandate” to earmark. He also said that the elimination of earmarks would “not save one dime” despite the fact that earmarks accounted for over $17.2 billion of Federal Budget last year.

Rep. Clyburn claims the U.S. Constitution mandates him to earmark, but I have to wonder what our Founding Fathers would think if they knew how Clyburn was using his earmarks.Let’s start with the “Five Rivers Scandal”.In 2006 Congressman Clyburn set aside $145,000 for the Five Rivers Development Corp. to build a community center. According the Myrtle Beach Sun News:

Five Rivers Community Development Corp. spent $105,950 on two consultants who lobbied federal legislators for money and influence, but the nonprofit agency did not report those activities on its federal tax returns, according to a review of Georgetown-based Five Rivers’ financial records by The Sun News.

Five Rivers paid $16,600 over 16 months in 2004 and 2005 to Charles Clyburn, the brother of U.S. Rep. James Clyburn, for consulting work. READ MORE...

How does Jim Clyburn and other liberals in congress feel about the U.S Constitution?

See video below and ask yourself, 'why in the world do people vote democrat?'


Unbelievable discourse between Judge Andrew Napolitano and Congressman Clyburn of South Carolina on Constitutionally defined role of the Federal Government. This was on "Brian and the Judge" on September 8, 2009. This gives one an idea of how liberals interpret the Constitution.

Jim Clyburn is also a 'race baiter' who falsely accuses anyone who criticizes Obama's policies as 'racist.'

Jim Clyburn is an IDIOT and we need to remove ALL dirtballs like Clyburn from congress.

1 comment:

  1. He got elected, and continues to get elected, because a district was drawn just for him with a majority black population. If the voters in his district were required to think they would never elect him, but the majority "look" instead of thinking. By the way, the drawing of his district is nothing but gerrymandering which is strictly illegal. Now you see why he feels he don't need to follow any law.

    ReplyDelete