data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1047e/1047eecdf9d9ee5185be5a7b8ed9aba86f7d97c1" alt=""
Which one?
Tom Elia seems a little confused by today’s editorial in the Chicago Sun-Times. The paper scolds the electorate for trusting an empty suit with no accomplishments to a high executive office, and itself for endorsing him. But which empty suit do they mean? If we remove the name, can you tell?
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/23e8b/23e8bf2863ab06d6b20f4c5e5abb2c189d567c00" alt=""
If the latest farcical revelations from the Rod Blagojevich trial tell us anything, it’s that the people of Illinois — that would be us — twice elected a narcissistic goof of a governor who was all show and no substance.
The man was an empty suit, albeit a $5,000 custom-made Oxxford empty suit. …
Character counts before all else. Real accomplishments count.
And all else, if there is anything else, comes third.
Yes, of course this self-flaggelation comes at the expense of disgraced former Governor Rod Blagojevich, he of the “f*****g valuable thing” and product of the Chicago Machine. Blago was more than just all show and no substance, of course; he was also allegedly a crook who intended to sell a Senate opening to the highest bidder. But even apart from the crime, the tapes at his trial show Blago to be a vain, self-centered, and irresponsible jerk who couldn’t have cared less about doing the job entrusted to him by the people of Illinois. READ MORE...
No comments:
Post a Comment