LIKE WIFE LIKE HUSBAND? Sherrod: "We Must Stop The White Man And His Uncle Toms" ALSO: Why Joan Walsh From 'Salon' Is An Idiot..

The ignorant, guilt-ridden libtard Joan Walsh...

First, a note of heartfelt appreciation for Joan Walsh of Salon. Her moving post on Charles Sherrod - in defense of his wife, Shirley - provided the inspiration required to dust off my Google skills. I simply had to fulfill her stated desire to share the actual words of Civil Rights icon Charles Sherrod with her readers, so touched was I by her profound tribute. And she's been swamped on TV, justifying Shirley Sherrod calling Fox and Andrew Breitbart racist. I can only hope she will be kind enough to direct her readers here, so we can all share his unique wisdom on race relations together, as one. That is, after all, the way it should be, is it not, Joan?

The civil rights heroism of Charles Sherrod

Andrew Breitbart sure picked the wrong people to symbolize black "racism."
If there's anyone more clueless about our civil rights history than Breitbart, as well as more abusive to it, I'm challenged to think of who it might be. He tests my commitment to nonviolent social change, but I'll share the work of Charles Sherrod to remember my values.

If I get a chance to talk to Charles Sherrod, I'll let him tell you what he thinks, in his own words, here.

Okay, Joan, though I do confess to being somewhat puzzled by the first quote I stumbled upon, especially as it came relatively recently - a full year after America had installed its first black administration in the White House.

Charles Sherrod: "We must stop the white man and his Uncle Toms from stealing our elections."

Gee, Joan, can you tell me what's so heroic about telling a room full of young black minds not even out in the world, yet - that if they ever embrace political, or socio-economic ideas that don't jibe with your hero's, the one elevated in a room before them, that they will be denounced as race-traitors? That is what Uncle Tom means, after all. What REALLY is heroic in that? It looks to me like what your hero does is build up their black identity to an extreme, then sends them a message that, if they don't vote, or act the way he wants them to, he and his community make them outcasts, stripping that very identity from them as traitors to their race. Is that the message heroic Civil Rights leaders are passing on to young blacks today? It sounds like it to me, Joan.

Maybe it's your hero's racism there that keeps young blacks on the Democrat plantation year after after, generation after generation - and not some non-existent racism you imagine on the other side. Why is your hero poisoning young minds, Joan? Or, is that just too much for you to grasp?

Shouldn't young minds be taught to think and explore the world for themselves, and not be infected with such poison perhaps before they even know who they are? Or, are you cool with your hero, there, Joan? How are you going to rationalize, not my reaction to your hero, but the not so subtle message he is delivering to those young black people looking up to him in a room?

But then, and I must admit to this being extremely troubling for me, Joan - I learned from your hero, Charles Sherrod, that because you are a white liberal, I shouldn't actually be reading you. See, I thought that when white liberals like you in the mainstream media provided significant coverage to black candidates at election time, it was because you wanted to be fair, perhaps even wanting to help them out. I would have never guessed that you were actually engaged in a nation-wide conspiracy to invoke fear and hatred into your white readers so that, come election day, they'd be all riled up at the black candidate, turning out to beat him.

But that is precisely what your hero tells me you are up to, Joan. Here I thought you were only trying to be fair. But then, I guess, you are white.

Charles Sherrod: "The tears that we've shed, so many times.... When the TV and the newspaper comes out the day of an election, or the day before an election. And tell white folk, all over, wherever we are running somebody for an office ... that blacks are going to TAKE that office over. And thousands are coming to the polls. And you gotta get it."

Geez, Joan. I'm really kind of disappointed in you and your hero after all this. I'll just let him tell you himself. I'm going to move on down below and write on some interesting things I discovered about the Sherrods and their New Communities project. I mean, racism is one thing, ... but separatist black-Marxist liberation politics? Is that what this is? Wow, you sure does have some interesting heroes for a white gal, Joan. I'll give you that.

Here are some words for your blog from Charles Sherrod, Joan:


Given the length of this, already - I'm going to cut to the chase - mostly just giving you the facts. In the video below, Sherrod claims they couldn't get funding because they were a corporation. He says nothing about racism being involved - though he does again display some of his own. But that is the grounds they sued upon - racism. And his son offers two views of what New Communities actually is, or was - family farm, non-profit corp., black-Marxist commune? Take your pick. READ MORE...

NOTE- IF YOU'RE GOING TO USE THE TERM 'UNCLE TOM' PLEASE LEARN THE REAL DEFINITION OF WHAT AN UNCLE TOM IS. IT SHOWS THE IGNORANCE OF PEOPLE LIKE SHERROD WHO USE THE TERM INCORRECTLY.

The real Uncle Tom was a black man born into slavery who gave his life to protect other slaves. When his story was turned into a movie, the writers re-worked the script making Uncle Tom's character the opposite; a slave who was loyal to his master. Unfortunately, this has become the most commonly known image of Uncle Tom. Because of the film, the term "Uncle Tom" has become synonomous with "sellout", degrading the real Uncle Tom. So once again, white liberals have successfully managed to teach blacks an incorrect, caucasion-favoring version of history.

The real sellouts are black democrats who continue to serve and support a party run by white elitist liberals who have used and oppressed blacks for decades with their failed policies. The victimization game has really worked out well hasn't it?

It's a fact that white liberals and black democrat politicians have destroyed black communities for over 40 years. The proof is in Detroit, Newark, Philadelphia, D.C, Baltimore, Chicago. Miami, Los Angeles, Flint, Camden, Gary, Trenton, Oakland, Atlanta, Memphis, Little Rock, New York City and other cities run by democrats from the bottom up, all with SUPER HIGH unemployment, dropout, teen pregnancy, drug use and crime rates. That 'liberalism' is working out really well for them....

When the white liberals throw (fund) black Mayors (slaves) into the inner cities, it isn't because they care about those inner city black communities, it's because they need those negro votes. White liberals like Nancy Pelosi and Barbara Boxer aren't going to leave the vineyards of San Francisco to campaign for the black vote in Oakland when they can have the mayor do it for them.

Most blacks are conservatives, yet they keep voting for a party run by white elitist liberal oppressors. More blacks are now fleeing the democrat party and leaning towards the republican and libertarian parties, but most will still vote democrat. There's over 30 black candidates running for congress and senate in the November elections this year, all running as republicans. Most endorsed by that so-called 'racist' teabagger party....

When liberals see more blacks fleeing the democrat party and attending tea parties, they do what they do best; they attack. They will lie, distort and personally attack anyone who gets in their way and play the race card when no racism exists, and the media has their back.

It's a shame that so many black democrat voters have forgotten their history. Maybe it will take 'two and a half white liberals' (Pelosi-Reid-Obama) ruining the country to wake them up.