Tuesday, May 11, 2010

SHOCKING?!? Elena Kagan: Some speech can be 'disappeared.' Wanted 'societal costs' counted against 1st Amendment rights


NEW YORK – President Obama's nominee for the Supreme Court, Elena Kagan, argued certain forms of speech that promote "racial or gender inequality" could be "disappeared."

In her few academic papers, Kagan evidences strong beliefs for court intervention in speech, going so far as to posit First Amendment speech should be weighed against "societal costs.”

In her 1993 article "Regulation of Hate Speech and Pornography After R.A.V," for the University of Chicago Law Review, Kagan writes:

"I take it as a given that we live in a society marred by racial and gender inequality, that certain forms of speech perpetuate and promote this inequality, and that the uncoerced disappearance of such speech would be cause for great elation." READ MORE...

3 comments:

  1. As a Harvard Law School Dean I provided free bagels and coffee, not to mention free condoms for the sexually promiscuous. I also stood tall in the face of all the taunts that dubbed me SHORTY.

    In every major issue of the day I remained silent, which beats by a long shot just saying present as our Turd-In-Chief was fond to do.
    What's not to like about me.

    Even my critic's on the left agree that I avoided
    Constitutional Controversies because my academic career was suprisingly and disturbingly devoid of writings and speeches which makes me an attractive choice for the Supreme Court.

    R.G.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Idiots For obama can I count on your support.

    ReplyDelete
  3. “It is the absolute right of the state to supervise the formation of public opinion." – Dr. Joseph Goebbels PhD. Hitler’s Nazi Propaganda Minister In a Speech given October 1933.

    Elaine Kagan, President Barrack Öbama’s new Supreme Court nominee wrote that she believes the United States government (now in the hands of Öbama) has the right to control the TV news and printed press because in her opinion the first Amendment is archaic and “certain” citizens’ speech should not be heard. In doing so Herr Öbama’s Über Court nominee Frauline Kagan, laid to rest the rumors about her sexual orientation as unimportant. However, in so doing Kagan proves herself to be a Sadist-Dominatrix. Frauline Kagan seems intent on beating to death the First Amendment and binding the Constitution to the putrid corpse of Ivy League Elitism.

    ReplyDelete