Wednesday, June 23, 2010

Pres. Obama Accepts McChrystal's Resignation, Petraeus Takes Over. Trades In Liberal General For A Conservative One? UPDATE-VIDEO Obama on Petraeus


Well this should make the king scumbag George Soros very happy. General Betray-us?

President Obama announced Wednesday that he has accepted Gen. Stanley McChrystal's resignation as the commander of U.S. forces in Afghanistan following a scathing article in which he and his aides were quoted criticizing the administration for its handling of the war. (Story continues below)


Moveon.org and Obama: Hypocrites and morons..

In doing so, Obama nominated Gen. David Petraeus, the head of U.S. Central Command and the former commanding general in Iraq, to replace him. The president stressed that while the decision was a difficult one, it does not represent a change in the course of the war.

"This is a change in personnel, but it is not a change in policy," Obama said in the Rose Garden, Petraeus by his side and McChrystal nowhere to be seen. READ MORE...


NOTE- Gen. McChrystal is a political liberal. He is a social liberal. He banned Fox News from the television sets in his headquarters. Yes, really. This puts to rest another false rumor: that McChrystal deliberately precipitated his firing because he wants to run for President.

You have to wonder about the judgement of Gen. McChrystal and why he would support such an obvious 'anti-American' President like Barack Hussein Obama. What the hell was McChrystal thinking?

It's bad enough the liberals have already infiltrated and tainted our public schools, college campuses, the media and entertainment industry and churches. Are we now stacking our armed forces with liberals? That would be a nightmare!

Many people are asking the question, 'Why in the world would Gen. McChrystal be stupid enough to talk to the liberal Rolling Stone magazine and then insult the commander in chief?'

Well now they have their answer. 'He's a liberal.'

We're also talking about a guy who banned FOX news, the ONLY honest news network in America, from the television sets in his headquarters. A sign of a naive fool..

Is he just another 'idiot' for Obama?

VIDEO- Obama Predicted Petraeus Failure in Iraq, Now Needs Him in Afghanistan?




Of course, radical antiwar Chicago Senator Obama was completely wrong and at odds with General Petraeus on the Iraq Surge.

Don’t expect that to be mentioned by any state-run media outlets today.

This afternoon President Barack Obama put General Petraeus in charge of Afghanistan.

The Hill reported:

Obama has selected Gen. David Petraeus to replace McChrystal.
READ MORE...

11 comments:

  1. Ah great!!!
    The teleprompter Turd communicates some scripted words praising Gen. McCrystal and then relieves him of his duties because the General had the temerity to tell the truth about what every soldier already knows about The Muslim Turd----

    The Obama Law---no one should speak their mind, the hell with free speech, unless it's about expressing a favorable judgment about me----the wrong one stepped down---

    ReplyDelete
  2. Today Obama stated that he was "accepting" General McChrystal's resignation, this based on the General's comments to Rolling Stone. These comments critical of the Administration.

    Obama condemns General McChrystal for engaging in activity that is allegedly "contrary to good order and discipline".

    Yet Obama violated the rules as well in his act of seeking this resignation in such a personal manner.

    As a 22 year Army veteran one of the things that I was taught during my time in uniform was that the military runs on a chain of command.

    Since General McChrystal had at least one other Officer (General Petraeus) not to mention the Sec Def and Sec Army, in the chain, and Obama has blatantly jumped this chain, he has abused his power to violate a system of which he is obviously ignorant.

    Now, I have to wonder if Congress is going to compound the actions of Obama by remaining silent, or will the House and Senate demand action against Obama for his violation of the U.S. Military Chain of Command?

    I called Harry Reids office to ask that question, they refused to comment.

    I called Pelosis office, and as ususal they don't care to hear from "We The People" since she is merely on a leash following in lockstep with Barrys agenda.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Today Obama stated that he was "accepting" General McChrystal's resignation, this based on the General's comments to Rolling Stone. These comments critical of the Administration.

    Obama condemns General McChrystal for engaging in activity that is allegedly "contrary to good order and discipline".

    Yet Obama violated the rules as well in his act of seeking this resignation in such a personal manner.

    As a 22 year Army veteran one of the things that I was taught during my time in uniform was that the military runs on a chain of command.

    Since General McChrystal had at least one other Officer (General Petraeus) not to mention the Sec Def and Sec Army, in the chain, and Obama has blatantly jumped this chain, he has abused his power to violate a system of which he is obviously ignorant.

    Now, I have to wonder if Congress is going to compound the actions of Obama by remaining silent, or will the House and Senate demand action against Obama for his violation of the U.S. Military Chain of Command?

    I called Harry Reids office to ask that question, they refused to comment.

    I called Pelosis office, and as ususal they don't care to hear from "We The People" since she is merely on a leash following in lockstep with Barrys agenda.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Fly's love Turd's----so does Jane Fonda

    General Petraeous will find out pronto that working for Obama and once working under Bush can be the difference between success and failure--

    A disagreement in opinion, and unable to settle their differences will eventually lead to dissension----General Petraeous love's this country and all the soldiers protecting it----Obama embraces any acts that will bring this country to its knees, so as to advance his globalist agenda---

    ReplyDelete
  5. I supported McChrystal in this whole thing until I heard he voted for Obama. That makes him, well, an idiot, and he's just getting what he deserves now. Dumbass. How can you make it to the level of general and still be so naive?

    ReplyDelete
  6. Did he really vote for Obama? Where's that stated? Id like to know. If he did, then I agree with you, how the hell can a general be that dumb and naive. Even Bill Ayers, Marxist professors, Wealth Redistribution and Black Liberation theology church Rev Wright was around before the election.

    ReplyDelete
  7. I'm surpised the Narcissist in Chief didn't find and appoint a gay General. There probably are some in the service, but you wouldn't know it because they have the class and respect for the uniform to keep it private. I also have to say people question why McC said this to Rolling Stone, well what other liberal trash rag would have been stupid enough to print it? It's a double bonus. Tons of BHO supporting idiots read RS, so now a bit of reality gets told to them about their messiah and RS sees it as a way to oppose the war (not realizing that it puts thheir savior in ad light). Sounds like a good tactical way to get it out there. Now RS will be destroyed.

    ReplyDelete
  8. The Rolling Stone article was General McChrystal's admission of guilt for voting for a Muslim Usurper and also to pull the curtain back and display publicly how the military feels about the Muslim Turd----

    ReplyDelete
  9. if he is a liberal, that would explain his stupidity. I served in the Marines and I couldn't imagine having more than 2 or 3 libtards out of 100 guys in our barracks. this was in the early 90's and even when Bill Clinton was President, his advisor was a conservative who kind of kept him in check as did the republican controlled congress, who are responsible for making Clinton look good as a President. (Outside of his CRI which destroyed the housing market).

    If liberals are entering the military, which from what I heard, seems to be true, it could only mean our military is next to crumble. I heard they even have 'timeout' in freaking bootcamp now! Waaahhh..we are becoming such a sissy country.

    ReplyDelete
  10. Even Obama's adherants want The Turd to be more (consistent with his incoherent beliefs.)

    Has there ever been a president who forsters more sefishness at the expense of public good, more indifference to suffering, more short term greed at the expense of long term forsight and who preaches to the lap-dog media (if only everybody were like me, the world's troubles would melt away.)

    General Petraeous would be well advised to understand that the Turd's rational choice of him is a calculated behaviour to maximize only Obama's self-interest---

    Longitudinal propagation of Marxism must be stopped before more people become infected with self-harming stupidity---it will become a manifest fact that if Marxism is not expunged it will spread like an epidemic----General McChrystal was a liberal, not a Marxist, who finally discovered that we have a communist in the White House---General Petraeous will not be infected with niceness with our countries future on the line----

    ReplyDelete
  11. Defence Secretary Robert Gates said Stanley McChrystal's comments were "distractions" to the war in Afghanistan.

    Well, all the community organizers comments are a distraction to the communities.

    Our prayers are with you General Petraeous.

    ReplyDelete