Thursday, December 30, 2010

STAY AWAY CRACKER! Race Card? Jesse Jackson, Black Candidates Says Bill Clinton Shouldn’t Campaign for Rahm

 

Earlier this week, Congressman Danny Davis issued a warning to former President Bill Clinton: steer clear of Chicago.

According to Davis, Clinton — America’s supposed “first black president” — is in danger of hurting his own reputation among Chicago’s African America community. The Chicago Tribune reported:

Davis, a veteran West Side congressman, said he is “seriously concerned and disturbed” by information Emanuel’s campaign released a few days ago that Clinton will travel to Chicago next month to support his former aide. Emanuel worked in the Clinton White House before serving as a North Side congressman and chief of staff to President Barack Obama.

“The African-American community has enjoyed a long and fruitful relationship with the Clintons, however it appears as though some of that relationship maybe fractured and perhaps even broken should former President Clinton come to town and participate overtly in efforts to thwart the legitimate political aspirations of Chicago’s black community,” Davis said in a statement. “We respectfully request and urge former President Clinton not to become involved in the Chicago mayoral election.” READ MORE...

JERKOFF: MSNBC Host Openly Mocks Gay Conservative in On-Air Interview. The 'Young Turks' DORK Gets Schooled!

Visit msnbc.com for breaking news, world news, and news about the economy


“Why on God’s green earth are you a Republican?” MSNBC’s Cenk Uygur asked GOProud chairman Christopher Barron. Instead of discussing the recent denunciation of his group by other conservative organizations — which is likely why Barron was invited on to speak in the first place — the MSNBC “interview” consisted only of Uygur mocking and laughing at Barron to his face, dismissing the notions that someone could be both gay and conservative (apparently being gay is the only issue Uygur thinks gays care about) and that conservatives are a “welcoming” crowd.

How very tolerant of him…

“I have an easier time being openly gay with conservatives than I do being a conservative with other gay people,” Barron said.

NOTE- The rude, unprofessional douchebag hosting this interview is the same 'Young Turks' dork from YouTube! He has been promoted from his mothers basement to the MSNBC studio...

IDIOT: Katie Couric: ‘We Need a Muslim Version of the Cosby Show’ UPDATE! 'The Mohammad Show'

KATIE COURIC: ‘WE NEED A MUSLIM VERSION OF THE COSBY SHOW’ from The Blaze on Vimeo.


In CBS News anchor Katie Couric’s “2010 in Review,“ the primetime news host discusses what she dubs the ”top stories” of the year, including apparent rampant Islamophobia and Americans’ “seething hatred” of Muslims. To help ease tensions, Couric suggests a “Muslim version of the ‘Cosby Show’”:

I also think sort of the chasm, between, or the bigotry expressed against Muslims in this country has been one of the most disturbing stories to surface this year. Of course, a lot of noise was made about the Islamic Center, mosque, down near the World Trade Center, but I think there wasn’t enough sort of careful analysis and evaluation of where this bigotry toward 1.5 billion Muslims worldwide, and how this seething hatred many people feel for all Muslims, which I think is so misdirected, and so wrong — and so disappointing. …

Maybe we need a Muslim version of The Cosby Show.

I know that sounds crazy, I know that sounds crazy. But The Cosby Show did so much to change attitudes about African-Americans in this country, and I think sometimes people are afraid of what they don’t understand…

As Newsbusters points out, this isn’t the first time Couric has climbed atop her high horse. Earlier this year, Couric denounced America’s so-called Islamophobes:

It might be Islamophobia, Obamaphobia, or both, but when loud speakers are blaring ‘Born in the USA’ and signs say ‘No Clubhouse for Terrorists,’ it’s clear we aren’t just talking about a mosque anymore. There is a debate to be had about the sensitivity of building this center so close to Ground Zero. But we can not let fear and rage tear down the towers of our core American values.

NOTE- Katie Couric thinks the American people are too stupid to understand Muslims. She's just so much smarter than everyone else! Katie is your typical elitist dirtbag who lives in a bubble of denial.

UPDATE- The New 'Mohammad Show' starring the very honest Muslim cleric Anjem Choudary. Premiere episode, "The Flag of Islam will one day fly over the White House."



"He's telling the truth."

LIbErals...lie..

DUMB DEMO-CRACKERS: Radical Cause and Effect: Van Jones Policies Are Redistributing Wealth to Hate Group New Black Panthers *UPDATED



This post has been updated to include important video that was missing from the original corrupted source file.



Well let us be the first to thank and give a shout out to those 'guilt-ridden' white liberal idiots who voted for Barack Hussein Obama. Thank you for creating more racism, more 'green' propaganda, more debt and wasteful spending and more wealth redistribution.

It's bad enough that liberals separate, use and oppress poor blacks, Hispanics and whites, but now they want to reward hate groups and felons with 'green' jobs that really don't do anything to improve the environment! (Unless they're working sanitation detail after a liberal rally in which they can pick up the tons of trash left by the progressive pigs)

AGAIN, for the 187th time, Glenn Beck was right and the idiotic liberals who attacked him were WRONG. Van Jones is everything Glenn Beck said he was AND some...

Obama's Multimillion-Dollar Hawaiian Vacation That You Paid For...


Do as I say, not as I do. Obama is your typical elitist, liberal hypocrite.

President Obama and his family are enjoying a delightful Christmas vacation with friends and family in the chief executive's home state of Hawaii.

Nobody questions a president's right or need to take take away from the White House, but an investigation by Hawaii Reporter has turned up some eye-opening information about the costs and other aspects of the Obama get-away.

Just consider these estimates on part of the costs of the latest Obama Hawaii trip:

* Mrs. Obama’s early flight to Hawaii: $63,000 (White House Dossier)

* Obama’s round trip flight to Hawaii: $1 million (GAO estimates)

* Housing in beachfront homes for Secret Service and Seals in Kailua ($1,200 a day for 14 days): $16,800

* Costs for White House staff staying at Moana Hotel: $134,400 ($400 per day for 24 staff) – excluding meals and other room costs

* Police overtime: $250,000 (2009 costs reported by Honolulu Police Department)

* Ambulance: $10,000 (City Spokesperson)

TOTAL COST: $1,474,200

But that $1.47 million figure leaves out a number of signficant costs that simply could not be calculated by Hawaii Reporter:

* Rental of office building in Kailua on canal

* Security upgrades and additional phone lines.

* Costs for car rentals and fuel for White House staff staying at Moana Hotel (Secret Service imports most of the cars used here to escort the president).

* Surveillance before the president arrives.

* Travel costs for Secret Service and White House staff traveling ahead of the President.

White House spokesmen insist Obama's vacation expenses are in line with those of previous presidents, which may well be true, but, since the government refuses to disclose many important details about any presidential journey, nobody can know for sure.

There appear to be reasons to suspect the Obamas' trip could have been done for less, according to Hawaii Reporter.

"They could have chosen a less expensive and more secure place to stay such as a beachfront home on the Kaneohe Marine Corps Air Station – just a two-minute drive away from the Kailuana Place property where they are now," according to Hawaii Reporter.

"The president visits the military base daily to workout, bowl with his kids or enjoy the more private beach there. He also could have stayed at a home 15 minutes away on the beach fronting Bellows Air Force Base as President Bill Clinton did." READ MORE...

Obama Pushing 'Backdoor' Cap-and-Trade Scheme



What the heck were the American people thinking when they voted for this moron? Google "climategate" to see the emails that show scientists lied in their studies on climate change. There is NO evidence of global warming. Visit Climate Depot for some real science please.

President Barack Obama's administration enters 2011 pressing ahead with new regulations and diplomacy to fight climate change, but it will face stiff challenges from opponents.

Cap and trade is a scam, it's a Ponzi scheme to confiscate more dollars from the American people. And it won't be the rich folks either; cap and trade will hurt the poor and middle class the most. If Obama gets away with this, Bernie Madoff should be released from prison because what he did doesn't compare to the massive theft that cap and trade will result in.

Obama Administration Pushing 'Backdoor' Cap-and-Trade Tax

WASHINGTON – President Barack Obama's administration enters 2011 pressing ahead with new regulations and diplomacy to fight climate change, but it will face stiff challenges from opponents.

The year ended with modest progress toward a new global deal during U.N.-led climate talks in Cancun, Mexico, where major emitters including the United States and China moved beyond past bad blood.

But U.S. environmentalists' hopes were dashed at home, where a proposal to create a first nationwide "cap-and-trade" plan to restrict greenhouse gas emissions in the world's largest economy died in the Senate.

The Obama administration is nonetheless taking action on its own. Starting Jan. 2, authorities will consider greenhouse gases when approving emission levels for large new industrial plants.

The federal Environmental Protection Agency announced on Dec. 23 that it would go a step further starting in 2012 by setting greenhouse gas standards for power plants and petroleum refineries — which together account for nearly 40 percent of the emissions blamed for climate change.

But Obama can expect even more hostility to his climate agenda starting in January, when the rival Republican Party takes charge of the House of Representatives.

Representative Fred Upton of Michigan, the Republican who will head the new House Energy and Commerce Committee, said the United States should be "working to bring more power online, not shutting plants down" to protect jobs.

"We will not allow the administration to regulate what they have been unable to legislate," Upton said.

"This Christmas surprise is nothing short of a back-door attempt to implement their failed job-killing cap-and-trade scheme."

The Obama administration insists it is only setting standards, such as favoring green technology, and not imposing numeric caps on emissions as envisioned under most cap-and-trade proposals.

The Obama team and environmentalists argue that a shift to green energy would create, not reduce, jobs by opening a new area of growth in the troubled economy.



The world's temperature has been steadily rising and many scientists point to rising disasters — including devastating floods in Pakistan and, counterintuitively, intense blizzards — as evidence of climate change.

The Democrats narrowly retained control of the Senate and Obama remains president, meaning he can fight any legislative efforts to weaken regulation on climate change.

But several Republicans have vowed to fight a key U.S. promise in international negotiations — to contribute to poor countries seen as suffering the worst effects of climate change.

The Cancun conference set up a Green Climate Fund, to which the European Union, Japan, and the United States have led pledges of $100 dollars a year starting in 2020

Bracing for concerns about accountability, the Obama administration fought successfully in Cancun to put the World Bank in charge of the Green Climate Fund.

Todd Stern, the chief U.S. climate negotiator, said the financial pledges were "extremely important" and "a core part of the deal."

"Obviously, the fiscal situation is exceedingly tough in the U.S. It's tough in Europe and other places as well. And we are going to have to do the best we possibly can to carry out" the promises, Stern said.

As part of a future deal, the United States has pressed for fast-growing emerging nations such as China to agree to binding and verifiable action on climate change.

India surprised many other countries in Cancun when it said it would consider a future binding deal. China has reiterated its opposition but promised to show flexibility.

Despite the shift in Washington, California — the most populous state — approved its own cap-and-trade system after voters rejected a referendum supported by the oil industry to suspend air pollution control laws.

By contrast, oil-producing Texas — the biggest carbon polluter — has refused to abide by federal guidelines on emissions, leading the Obama administration to take over its permit system.

Christine O'Donnell: FBI Investigation a Ridiculous Thuggish Rumor



Failed Senate candidate Christine O'Donnell denied Thursday that she misused campaign funds, telling Fox News that an apparent criminal investigation into her spending is yet another attempt to tarnish the Tea Party movement.

"It appears that this is just the same thug tactics that they've been using for months to discredit this anti-establishment movement," O'Donnell said.

The Delaware Republican defended herself after it was revealed that federal authorities have launched the probe to determine whether she broke the law by using campaign money to pay personal expenses. On Wednesday, a person familiar with the investigation told The Associated Press that it was being conducted. The case, which has been assigned to two federal prosecutors and two FBI agents in Delaware, has not been brought before a grand jury.

But O'Donnell told Fox News it was "awfully suspicious" for a reporter to be tipped off to the probe before anybody on her campaign team. She described the claim as "trumped-up," suggesting it stemmed from an earlier complaint filed by watchdog Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington.

"There's never been any misappropriation or misuse of campaign funds," O'Donnell said, suggesting the accusations were being driven by political opponents. READ MORE...

NOTE- The fact that 'CREW' is behind this makes it instantly NOT credible. The biggest scumbag in the world, the communist George Soros, funds 'CREW.' Why bother reading any further. When organizations like Media Matters, Centers for American Progress, CREW and Moveon.org lie 95% of the time, why would anyone believe this story?

Progressives are domestic terrorists and shouldn't be trusted.

Obama Makes Dangerous Recess Appointment: Lawmakers Outraged Over Obama’s Latest Recess Apointments


C'mon people, you can't get any more anti-American than this guy. The people who voted for Obama should be ashamed of themselves. Sit home next time and do the country a favor.

Obama Makes Dangerous Recess Appointment

The White House announced Wednesday that Obama would use his power to make recess appointments to fill envoy posts to Azerbaijan, Syria and NATO allies Turkey and the Czech Republic and appoint James Cole as assistant attorney general.

Specific senators had blocked or refused to consider the confirmations of the nominees for various reasons, including questions about their qualifications. But in the most high-profile case, that of the new envoy to Syria, Robert Ford, a number of senators objected because they believed sending an ambassador to the country would reward it for bad behavior.

“Making underserved concessions to Syria tells the regime in Damascus that it can continue to pursue its dangerous agenda and not face any consequences from the U.S.,” Rep. Ileana Ros-Lehtinen R-Fla., the incoming chairman of the House Foreign Affairs Committee, said in a statement. “That is the wrong message to be sending to a regime which continues to harm and threaten U.S. interests and those of such critical allies as Israel.”

The administration had argued that returning an ambassador to Syria after a five-year absence would help persuade Syria to change its policies regarding Israel, Lebanon, Iraq and support for extremist groups. Syria is designated a “state sponsor of terrorism” by the State Department.

President George W. Bush’s administration withdrew a full-time ambassador from Syria in 2005 after terrorism accusations and to protest the assassination of former Lebanese Prime Minister Rafik Hariri, killed in a Beirut truck bombing that his supporters blamed on Syria. Syria denied involvement. READ MORE...

Obama Makes Dangerous Recess Appointment
Obama uses recess appointment to seat Justice Dept. official

Wednesday, December 29, 2010

BUSTED! Blogger Dismantles Fox-Viewers-Are-Misinformed Study. 2010: Fox News Dominates Cable News. Tops All Competitors Combined



Remember that study from the University of Maryland and WorldPublicOpinion.org saying Fox News viewers are the most “misinformed” audience? It seems that was misinformation.

Competitive Enterprise Institute Communications Director, and licensed lawyer, Lee Doren has just released a short video expose showing that the study is severely flawed.

“After looking at the supposed ‘myths’ that Fox News watchers believe, I quickly realized that something was wrong with the study,” Doren writes in the video’s YouTube introduction. “As a result, I read the study very carefully and realized that the whole study was bogus.”

He says the study does “not have data to support its conclusions,“ and goes as far as to say it ”may simply demonstrate that Fox News viewers are more informed than the researchers.”

And just in case Doren‘s video isn’t enough, it’s important to note (as we did in our original piece) that the WorldPublicOpinion.org website includes the Tides Foundation as one of its major sponsors. That group is directly connected to George Soros.

The study was also debunked by columnist David Zurawik of the Baltimore Sun. As he points out, the study admits in its own pages that the term “misinformed” is relative:

Here is the big, fat wonking problem with the survey: How do you define “misinformed” and “informed”?

The researchers seemed to understand this, and to their credit, they acknowledge it at the top of their findings. Bu they choose to deal with it only in what they term a “note.”

Here is the key passage of their note: “A study of misinformation raises the somewhat delicate question of what is true….In the course of this study, to identify “misinformation” among voters, we used as reference points the conclusions of key government agencies that are run by professional experts and have a strong reputation for being immune to partisan influences….”

Deciding which experts and/or agencies do or don’t have a “strong reputation for being immune to partisan influences” seems like a highly subjective business to me — as talk of reputation always is.

And when you cut through such non-scientific talk, what you have for the definition of a respondent who is considered “informed” is essentially someone who agrees with the conclusions of experts in government agencies. When specific questions in the survey are framed around facts, like who was president when a certain piece of legislation passed, you can say someone is misinformed. But that is not always the case. And that is where one problem resides.

So, presumably, if you were to disagree with such top economic experts in government as Timothy Geithner or Larry Summers, you would be labeled as misinformed. If you dared to disagree with those experts in government who say that the Wall Street bailout was absolutely necessary and that the takeover of GM was desperately needed and that healthcare reform will actually be good for the economy — you would be labeled as MISINFORMED.

Fox’s original response to the study was to make fun of the school by pointing out that “the latest Princeton Review ranked the University of Maryland among the top schools for having ‘Students Who Study The Least’ and being the ‘Best Party School.’”

Considering what’s been uncovered, they may want to hit back with something much harder.

2010: Fox News Dominates Cable News — Tops All Competitors Combined

WORD POLICE: Calling 'Illegal' Aliens 'Illegal Aliens' Is Offensive! Megyn Kelly: Calling Illegals ‘Undocumented’ Is Like Calling Rape 'Sex'



In response to the Society of Professional Journalists’ call for news reporters nationwide to drop the term “illegal immigrant” from their news coverage to avoid offending Latinos, Fox News‘ Megyn Kelly sounded off Wednesday on America’s growing obsession with political correctness:

Full segment:

Surprised? Famous Marine Drill Sergeant is NOT a Fan of Obama



Retired Marine Corps drill sergeant and actor R. Lee Ermey took an opportunity to rail against the Obama administration during a Dec. 10 appearance on Roe & Roeper’s Miracle on Indianapolis Blvd. Holiday Extravaganza live broadcast to benefit the USO.

The retired vet stressed that the Marines’ Toys 4 Tots program was working through the struggling economy to bring holiday cheer to young boys and girls, but also delivered a political punch to the Obama administration which he claimed was trying to destroy the country by imposing socialism:

His career in Hollywood is probably over after telling the truth about Obama....but at least he has his PRIDE. America needs more actors like R. Lee Ermey and Jon Voight, more conservative producers, directors and media journalists.

FNC‘s Megyn Kelly Disgusted With Obama’s Praise for Philadelphia Eagles, Michael Vick. Tucker Carlson: Michael Vick ‘Should Have Been Executed’



President Barack Obama’s praise for the Philadelphia Eagles giving convicted dog-murderer Michael Vick a second chance at his NFL career had Fox News‘ Megyn Kelly up in arms today as she condemned Vick’s “systematic torture” of animals and wondered if someone who had treated human beings the same way would be worth of a presidential seal of approval:

Tucker Carlson: Michael Vick ‘Should Have Been Executed’



NOTE- It isn't that Michael Vick doesn't deserve a second chance to work and earn a living playing football. He did his time and paid his dues, but for President Obama to make that statement is really disgusting. If you disagree, please see video below. Watch the video below; do you approve of this?



President Obama should let Michael Vick 'dogsit' his dog Bo. He would make a great sparring partner or 'bait' dog for Vicks pit bulls.

Barack Hussein Obama sympathizes with terrorists, supports the new black panthers, dog killers, cop killers and appoints members of the communist party to his administration, but he considers the Cambridge Police 'stupid' and tea partiers irrelevant white trash. How in the world did this moron become President of the United States? Do we really have that many dumb voters in America? (Apparently it's around 66,000,000)



Where's PETA and those so-called animal rights activists at? Where's Ashley Judd and those other celebrity libtards who attacked Sarah Palin for the approval of hunting wolf to prevent them from wondering in residential neighborhoods and eating little kids? Apparently clubbing, hanging, electrocuting, beating and drowning dogs because they lost a fight to another dog is different because Obama is a forgiving guy.

Will Ashley Judd to make a new commercial about Obama being so supportive of Michael Vick, the REAL dog killer? If she does, we hope she's honest about it, UNLIKE the last commercial she made where Judd conveniently leaves important FACTS out of the commercial making Sarah Plain look like some sort of cold-blooded wolf killer.

Tuesday, December 28, 2010

DUMBACRATS: 111th Congress Added More Debt Than First 100 Congresses Combined: $10,429 Per Person in U.S.



Why is this economic terrorist still breathing? Please stop voting democrat...

(CNSNews.com) - The federal government has accumulated more new debt--$3.22 trillion ($3,220,103,625,307.29)—during the tenure of the 111th Congress than it did during the first 100 Congresses combined, according to official debt figures published by the U.S. Treasury.

That equals $10,429.64 in new debt for each and every one of the 308,745,538 people counted in the United States by the 2010 Census.

The total national debt of $13,858,529,371,601.09 (or $13.859 trillion), as recorded by the U.S. Treasury at the close of business on Dec. 22, now equals $44,886.57 for every man, woman and child in the United States.

In fact, the 111th Congress not only has set the record as the most debt-accumulating Congress in U.S. history, but also has out-stripped its nearest competitor, the 110th, by an astounding $1.262 trillion in new debt.

During the 110th Congress—which, according to the Clerk of the House, officially convened on Jan. 4, 2007 and adjourned on Jan. 4, 2009--the national debt increased $1.957 trillion. When that Congress adjourned less than two years ago, it claimed the record as the most debt-accumulating Congress in U.S. history. As it turned out, however, its record did not last long.

The $3.22 trillion in new federal debt run up during the 111th Congress exceeds by 64 percent the $1.957 trillion in new debt run up during the 110th.

Although the 111th Congress cast its last vote on Dec. 22, it will not officially adjourn until next week.

Democrats controlled both the House and Senate in the 110th and 111th Congresses.

The 108th Congress ($1.159 trillion in new debt) and 109th ($1.054 trillion in new debt) take third and fourth place among all U.S. Congresses for accumulating debt. In both these Congresses, Republicans controlled both the House and Senate.

Still, the $3.22 trillion in new debt accumulated during the record-setting 111th Congress is more than three times the $1.054 trillion in new debt accumulated by the last Republican-majority Congress (the 109th) which adjourned on Dec. 8, 2006.

Historically, according to the U.S. Treasury, the federal debt did not reach $3.22 trillion until September 1990, during the 101st Congress. Between the first Congress, which adjourned in 1791 leaving behind approximately $75 million in debt, and the convening of the 101st Congress, which occurred on Jan. 3, 1989, the national debt grew to $2.684 trillion.

During the Rep. Nancy Pelosi’s (D-Calif.) tenure as speaker, which commenced on Jan. 4, 2007, the federal government has run up $5.177 trillion in new debt. That is about equal to the total debt the federal government accumulated in the first 220 years of the nation's existence, with the federal debt rising from $5.173 trillion on July 23, 1996 to $5.181 trillion on July 24, 1996. READ MORE...

JUSTICE! Man Calls 911 to Report 'The Media'



A man has been arrested in Florida after he unnecessarily called 911 twice in one night, once requesting deputies bring him business cards, and a second time to report “the media”:

Lawrence Gauthier, 61, of Oak Hill, has a history of using the 911 emergency line as his own personal request hot line, Volusia County deputies said.

On Sunday, Gauthier dialed 911 first to request that a deputy bring him business cards and later, while apparently intoxicated, he called 911 and told the dispatcher he wanted the media arrested, but admitted there was no emergency, deputies said.

Deputies said Gauthier has called the Sheriff’s Office 16 times since November to request business cards and check up on deputies.

Gautheir was charged with making false 911 calls and taken to the Volusia Branch Jail.

While we don‘t condone Gauthier’s actions, if you call 911 on “the media” we just might have to say: we understand it.

CHRIS MATTHEWS: Why Doesn't Obama Just Release The Birth Certificate?

Visit msnbc.com for breaking news, world news, and news about the economy


Chris Matthews and his favorite MSNBC resident 'house negro' Clarence Page, the black liberal, believe that Barack Obama has far more 'important things to do' than having to show his REAL birth certificate. (Like taking vacations, playing basketball, confiscating wealth, destroying the economy and not reading the bills he signs)

What an stupid answer!

It's also very disturbing to hear a progressive like Chris Matthews use the term 'manufactured controversy' since it's the progressives who are the true masters of manufacturing crisis.(Like global warming)

CLICK HERE TO SEE HOW THE LEFT MANUFACTURES CRISIS
‘Send Me a Copy’: MSNBC‘s Chris Matthews Fans ‘Birther’ Flames

Hawaii Gov. Neil Abercrombie recently announced that he was offended by the so-called “birther” movement and would try to publicly release President Barack Obama’s birth certificate — whether the White House wants him to or not — in an attempt to finally put the debate to rest:

“It’s not up to the President. It has nothing to do with the President,” Abercrombie told CNN’s Ed Henry Monday. “This has to do with the people of Hawaii who love him. People who loved his mom and dad. This has to do with respect to the office of the president that he’s entitled to and it has to do with the respect that every single person’s mother and father are entitled to.”

As the movement calling for the president’s birth certificate has gained some ground, MSNBC’s Chris Matthews fanned the flames of the debate Monday as he encouraged President Obama to send him a copy of the birth certificate and put an end to the “manufactured controversy once and for all:



Maybe this governor is a plant? Maybe he's naive, or he really believes Barack Obama isn't hiding anything. Obama lies about everything he talks about from his upbringing, campaign promises, affiliations, friends, accomplishments, the state of the economy and his church just to name a few. He's a pathological liar and no one can honestly dispute that, just watch him lie on Youtube! We don't call Obama supporters 'idiots' for nothing...

When you lie as much as Obama, spend millions on attorneys to fight showing your REAL birth certificate, seal all of your college transcripts so no one can see them and have the most 'shadiest' past of any politician in history, the American people have the right to question his background! Deal with it...

Even liberals are worried about Obama's birth and the way to tell is simple; listen to them insult and attack people who question his eligibility. Liberals do that because they want to discredit anyone who doesn't agree with their agenda. If Obama was born in Kenya and admitted lying about it to con his way into the Presidency to destroy the country, these liberal IDIOTS would still support him. That's why 'liberalism' has been diagnosed as a mental disorder. Why would anyone want to be a progressive liberal? They're nuts...

Why weren't these progressive sleazeballs in the media calling liberals 'birthers' when the left was questioning John McCain's citizenship? Liberals are the biggest hypocrites and believe they're dishonesty is justified to promote their ideology.

Idiots...

Progressive Ed Schultz's 'House Negro' Jesse Jackson Calls for ‘Radical Reordering’ of American Economy



When plan A fails, repeat it and call it plan B.

A MESSAGE FOR JESSE JACKSON- (No, not the most corrupt member of congress, that's his son Jesse Jackson Jr.)

"Hey Jesse, the war on poverty has failed! It has failed because the mostly white liberals who you side with, who control YOU, the NAACP and the democratic party, have kept many poor blacks government dependent, uneducated, pregnant, addicted to drugs, incarcerated, unemployed, broke and voting DEMOCRAT. Without them, YOU have no job, no income and no 'Ed Schultz Show' appearances. You only have a degree in 'spitting on white peoples hamburgers' and know NOTHING about the economy. You actually help other black and white liberals (democrats) keep poor blacks down and create additional poverty by creating 'victims' and high taxes, destroying the black family and killing the incentive to work. Obama himself hasn't even done NOTHING to lower the astronomical black unemployment numbers since he took office! Like Obama, deep down inside, you're nothing but a 'white liberal.' You side with people who have no problem aborting (killing) millions of black babies and protecting illegal aliens who take American jobs, but when it comes to job creation, it can take a back seat to gay marriage. Give us a break, you ain't fooling anyone, not even the guilty white liberals who own you and use you."

Shock Audio: New Black Panther Leader Reveals Collusion at NYC Meeting With Ahmadinejad to Build Alliance, Secure Raw Materials and Overthrow America



Sounds like a threat. We should send a special forces team in to take him out. Unfortunately, our commander in chief probably agrees with the mission of the black panthers.

Howard University must be proud to have produced a piece of garbage like Malik Zulu Shabazz. That's his 'play' name anyway...

And where the heck is NBC, ABC, CNN, CBS, MSNBC, Katie Couric, Brian Williams, Diane Sawyer and Chris Matthews? Isn't this considered NEWS? Malik Zulu Shabazz is friends with our president, Barack Hussein Obama, and Malik Zulu Shabazz has been a guest at the White House for crying out loud! Sarah Palin goes fishing and bakes cookies on her new t.v show and it's a major story!

Why won't the progressive liberal vermin in the media cover this? Why is this not considered news, but John Boehner crying on the house floor is?

ANSWER- It's because liberals are self-loathing cowards. Especially the white liberals in the media who have no spine. They're a disgrace and a joke. It's because of them that no one trusts the media today. It's because of them that newspapers are failing, cable news ratings are down, and most Americans don't trust the news because of media bias.

And because liberals are idiots...

Amateur Videographer Rolls as Sanitation Workers Destroy a Ford Explorer in NY



Caution: Language warning.

City workers destroy a Ford Explorer trying to free a snowbound front-loader in Brooklyn Heights, New York after the storm of 2010. The crazy thing here….the vehicle WAS….wait for it….A NYC Dept of Buildings city owned vehicle. I went down, I know the owner, they are aware of the video and no police ever came. Hope that answers a lot of questions. Obviously some comments here in response are from the driver himself….read-on.

Isn't government just great?!? Throw in some affirmative action, some union representation and these two tools might be headed for a promotion soon.

Monday, December 27, 2010

Weather Channel Boss Calls Global Warming 'The Greatest Scam In History' ALSO: Mocked U.K. Forecaster Who Predicted Snowy Winter Speaks Out



The founder of the The Weather Channel in the US has described the concept of global warming as 'the greatest scam in history' and accused global media of colluding with 'environmental extremists' to alarm the public.

The deceit behind global warming
Climate change is like 'World War Three'
"It is the greatest scam in history. I am amazed, appalled and highly offended by it. Global Warming; It is a SCAM," John Coleman wrote in an article published on ICECAP, the International Climate and Environmental Change Assessment Project, which is known for challenging widely published theories on global warming.

The maverick weather forecaster is known for his regular critique of widely accepted global warming theories. The Weather Channel broadcasts weather forecasts and weather-related news in the US 24 hours a day.

His views challenge the consensus of the international science community that it is at least 90 per cent certain that temperatures will continue to rise, with average global surface temperature projected to increase by between 1.4 and 5.8ºC above 1990 levels by 2100.

This increase will be accompanied by rising sea levels, more intense precipitation events in some countries, increased risk of drought in others, and adverse effects on agriculture, health and water resources.

A recent joint statement by the scientific academies of 17 countries, including the UK's Royal Society, endorsed the theory of climate change and dismissed doubts raised over the need for action to mitigate possible damage caused by climate change.

"We do not consider such doubts justified," the group said in a joint statement, urging prompt action to reduce emissions of greenhouse gases.

But Mr Colemen slams their views as part of a global conspiracy: "Some dastardly scientists with environmental and political motives manipulated long term scientific data to create in [sic] allusion of rapid global warming."

"Other scientists of the same environmental whacko type jumped into the circle to support and broaden the "research" to further enhance the totally slanted, bogus global warming claims. Their friends in government steered huge research grants their way to keep the movement going. Soon they claimed to be a consensus.

"Environmental extremists, notable politicians among them, then teamed up with movie, media and other liberal, environmentalist journalists to create this wild "scientific" scenario of the civilization threatening environmental consequences from Global Warming unless we adhere to their radical agenda.

"Now their ridiculous manipulated science has been accepted as fact and become a cornerstone issue for CNN, CBS, NBC, the Democratic Political Party, the Governor of California, school teachers and, in many cases, well informed but very gullible environmental conscientious citizens.

"Only one reporter at ABC has been allowed to counter the Global Warming frenzy with one 15 minutes documentary segment."

He added: "I have read dozens of scientific papers. I have talked with numerous scientists. I have studied. I have thought about it. I know I am correct.

"There is no run away climate change. The impact of humans on climate is not catastrophic. Our planet is not in peril."

Tea Party Rep.-elect Walsh will turn down government health insurance (We need more politicians like him!)


A newly-elected GOP Rep. announced that he is refusing the congressional health insurance plan in a show of solidarity with the American people.

Rep-elect Joe Walsh (R-IL) told the New York Times that he will stick to his Tea Party roots and decline the government health care provided to members of congress.

“I don’t think congressmen should get pensions or cushy health care plans,” he said. But it‘s a decision that’s not being welcomed by everyone in his family. Walsh’s wife has a pre-existing medical condition, and she’ll now be charged with the difficult task of finding a plan on the open market.

Walsh joins two other Republicans in declining the government’s health plan. So far, incoming Reps. Bobby Schilling (IL) and Mike Kelly (PA) have made similar decisions.

But Walsh’s decision is in lockstep with some of his other positions. He’s a staunch fiscal conservative who wants serious entitlement reform, is hoping to repeal Obamacare, and is even against the recent tax-rate deal.

“We cut taxes, raised spending and contributed to the deficit,” he said of the deal. “Republicans should have held out for something better.”

That, along with the rejection of health care, may be politically incorrect. But Walsh doesn’t care.

“I’m going to D.C. absolutely prepared to lose in two years.”

Return of ‘Death Panels’? Obama to Enact End-of-Life Planning for Medicare



'ANSWER THE QUESTION LIBTARD!' False charges and personal attacks by Republicans? It turns out that the Republicans were telling the truth and the liberals, AGAIN, have lied to the American people. Obama appointed this Marxist 'toilet bug' Donald Berwick to run the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services. He SUPPORTS death panels and wealth redistribution and they can't dispute the VIDEO with the words from the radical Marxists own mouth! Progressives are very sick, mentally disturbed people.

After public outcry over “death panels” forced Democrats to drop their proposed end-of-life planning from the health care overhaul legislation, the Obama administration is pressing forward to enact the same measures by bureaucratic regulations. The new regulations are set take effect starting Jan. 1, the New York Times reports.



Under the new policy, outlined in a Medicare regulation, the government will pay doctors who advise patients on options for end-of-life care, which may include advance directives to forgo aggressive life-sustaining treatment.

Congressional supporters of the new policy, though pleased, have kept quiet. They fear provoking another furor like the one in 2009 when Republicans seized on the idea of end-of-life counseling to argue that the Democrats’ bill would allow the government to cut off care for the critically ill.

The final version of the health care legislation, signed into law by President Obama in March, authorized Medicare coverage of yearly physical examinations, or wellness visits. The new rule says Medicare will cover “voluntary advance care planning,” to discuss end-of-life treatment, as part of the annual visit. READ MORE...

'Apocalyptic Pain’: Sen. Coburn Warns of ‘Bleak’ Greece-Like Future for U.S.



“Apocalyptic pain” from an out-of-control debt could cause 18 percent unemployment and a massive contraction in the economy that would destroy the middle class, a leading Republican deficit hawk said in an interview that aired Sunday.

Sen. Tom Coburn, R-Okla., who recently issued a report on government waste, warned that the U.S. only has about three or four years to get its fiscal house in order or it could find itself facing austerity measures seen in Greece, Ireland, Spain, Portugal and earlier in Japan.

Coburn went on to say:

“I think you’ll see a 15 to 18 percent unemployment rate. I think you will see an 8 to 9 percent decline in GDP. I think you‘ll see the middle class just destroyed if we don’t do this. And the people that it will harm the most will be the poorest of the poor, because we’ll print money to try to debase our currency and get out of it and what you will see is hyperinflation.”

Here’s the complete interview:

RINO WATCH: Scott Brown Disappointing



Senator Scott Brown’s decision to buck his party leadership in recent days on the “don’t ask, don’t tell’’ military policy and on a nuclear arms treaty has set off a new wave of anger among some of the activists who helped elect him — and renewed talk among conservatives that he might face a primary challenge.

Some Tea Party movement leaders who dislike Brown’s votes acknowledge that the Massachusetts Republican has demonstrated his independent and pragmatic streak, and by doing so may strengthen his chances at reelection in 2012. No primary challenger has emerged, and it is unclear whether a newcomer could wage a serious fight against Brown and his $6.8 million war chest.

But the threat of a primary challenge from conservatives — as well as the potential that national Tea Party groups will withhold financial support — appears to have grown, according to the movement’s activists. Brown’s votes in the past week follow his crucial support for the overhaul of financial regulations, which remains a particular sore point with conservatives.

“I think that there will be a primary challenge,’’ said Christen Varley, president of the Greater Boston Tea Party. “There’s enough of an underground movement in the Tea Party movement as seeing him as not being conservative enough. There probably will be multiple people who attempt to run against him.’’ READ MORE...

OP-ED: Obama Has Lost The World



After the 2010 elections, it’s not exactly news that Obama has lost America. But in a less public referendum, he also lost the world. Obama’s cocktail party tour of the world’s capitals may look impressive on a map, but is irrelevant on a policy level. In less than two years, the White House has gone from being the center of world leadership to being irrelevant, from protecting world freedom to serving as a global party planning committee.

Even the Bush Administration’s harshest critics could never have credibly claimed that George W. Bush was irrelevant. He might have been hated, pilloried and shouted about– but he couldn’t be ignored. However Obama can be safely ignored. Invited to parties, given the chance to show off his cosmopolitan sophisticated by reciting one or two words in the local lingo, read off a teleprompter, along with some cant about the need for everyone to pull together and make the world a better place, and then dismissed for the rest of the evening.

As a world leader, he makes a passable party guest. He has a broad smile, brings along his own gifts and is famous in the way that celebrities, rather than prime ministers and presidents are famous. On an invitation list, he is more Bono than Sarkozy, Leonardo DiCaprio not Putin. You don’t invite him to talk turkey, not even on Thanksgiving. He’s just one of those famous people with a passing interest in politics who gets good media attention, but who has nothing worthwhile to say. READ MORE...

Obama's Reversal on 'Indigenous Peoples' Rights Stirs Concern Over Legal Claims.



What's the difference between Barack Hussein Obama and admitted communist Van Jones? ANSWER: Nothing... And Glenn Beck is the crazy one?!? = 'Idiots.'

President Obama's decision last week to reverse U.S. policy and back a U.N. declaration on the rights of "indigenous peoples" has touched off a debate on whether the move could boost American Indian legal claims over the ills they suffered dating back to the colonial period.

The president announced his decision at the White House Tribal Nations Conference last week, making the United States the last nation to endorse the statement -- the Bush administration had opposed it since it was adopted in 2007. American Indian advocacy groups cheered the move, finalized after a months-long administration review.

But John Bolton, the former U.S. ambassador to the United Nations, said the "abstract" document -- which in several sections discusses the "right to redress" -- will probably be used to fuel new legal claims. And he predicted the issue would complicate those cases more than it would help either side actually resolve them.

"It's a kind of feel-good document that has so many unclear phrases in it that nobody's really sure what it means when you agree to it," Bolton told FoxNews.com. "It's wrong and potentially dangerous to sign onto a document that you don't fully understand the implications of."

The non-binding U.N. document includes dozens of provisions but generally states that indigenous people should not be discriminated against, should be able to sustain their own political and social systems, and have rights to the "lands, territories and resources which they have traditionally owned" or used. READ MORE...

Sunday, December 26, 2010

Why do liberals hate White People, The United States, Heterosexuals, and Christians?



Liberals seem to think it's alright to bash only certain groups of people.

-Liberals love to bash white people.
-Conservatives seem to understand that all people are one human family.

-Liberals love to bash America.
-Conservatives are proud of America.

-Liberals are intolerant of heterosexuals that are for traditional marriage.
-Conservatives don't care what gay people do as long as they keep it in the bedroom where it belongs.

-Liberals are mainly Pro-Islamic, Pro-Atheist, and think we've mistreated the terrorists.
-Conservatives don't care what religion you practice, but leave us alone.

Why is it that liberals have such a problem with the western world? If America collapsed tomorrow, over 100 nations would starve to death within a few months. Many of them are African and Arab nations.

So, why do they hate these groups?

Fred Thompson on Democrats' Omnibus Spending Bill: "Like a bunch of drunks going bar-hopping on the way to an AA meeting"


Fred Thompson on Twitter- - Dems propose $1T budget, 1900 pages, stuffed w/ earmarks. Like a bunch of drunks going bar-hopping on the way to an AA meeting. #ftrs #tcot

LIBTARD: ‘I Know’: Chris Matthews Agrees as Time Mag’s Klein Attacks Beck as ‘Tele-Charlatan’ & John Birch Conspiracy Theorist

Friday, December 24, 2010

General: Muslim 'moderates' plot undoing of America. Praises daring investigation exposing 'terrorists with neckties' in D.C.


It's one of the most controversial and electrifying books of our time – recently praised publicly by a top U.S. general as the book to read on the radical Islamic threat within America – and today only, WND readers can get "Muslim Mafia: Inside the Secret Underworld That's Conspiring to Islamize America" for only $4.95 – a $21 discount off the regular price! Based on an audacious six-month undercover operation in which three young investigators pretended to convert to Islam and became interns at the notorious Council on American-Islamic Relations, "Muslim Mafia" exposes the vast but little-reported subversion of America by the dangerous Muslim Brotherhood – parent organization of al-Qaida, Hamas and other front-line terror groups.

The book’s frightening allegations are well supported by more than 12,000 pages of confidential, internal CAIR documents secretly extracted during the unprecedented undercover investigation.

Recently, retired Lt. Gen. William G. Boykin, former U.S. deputy undersecretary of defense for intelligence, made an impassioned plea for Americans to learn about the inner workings of stealth jihadists by reading "Muslim Mafia."

"There's a recent book that came out called 'Muslim Mafia,'" said Boykin at a major Christian conference. "Have any of you read this? Have any of you ever seen it? I encourage you to get this book – 'Muslim Mafia.' … This book will scare you. This book will open your eyes. This book will shake you. What this book says is frightening."

Watch Gen. Boykin describe "Muslim Mafia" below:


The trail of information reveals the insidious and well-funded efforts of the seditious Muslim Brotherhood under the nonprofit guise of CAIR to fully support the international jihad against the United States, with the goal of transforming American society from within. They hope to accomplish this through terrorist activities, fraud, and infiltration of our political and intelligence systems, which these documents clearly reveal. READ MORE...

FLOTUS Michelle Obama chows at the taxpayers' trough


First lady Michelle Obama didn't feel like waiting around cold, boring old Washington, D.C., for her husband and Congress to wrap up their work for the year. So she simply stuck the taxpayers with the $63,000 tab to start her Hawaiian vacation a bit early — just a few short months after the Spain vacation with her gal-pals that set us all back a pretty penny.

With her husband announcing a two-year pay freeze for federal employees as a way to save taxpayers a few precious dollars, it's jaw-dropping that Michelle Obama could be so relentlessly politically tone-deaf. And insensitive. And even a tad bit selfish, spoiled and thoughtless, perhaps? I tend to cringe when folks gratuitously slam the first lady simply because they don't like her husband's policies, but this latest antic on the part of Michelle Obama really takes the cake.

The FLOTUS spending our tax dollars on herself makes Nancy Reagan using private donations for expensive White House dinner china for entertaining heads of state on behalf of the nation seem like pretty small potatoes.

In the future, it would be advisable for Michelle Obama to either pay for her Paris Hilton-style globetrotting herself, or to fund it with private donations. Meanwhile, we can all spend a few minutes trying to calculate how many federal employees' pay raises it takes to pay for Mrs. Obama to get an extra day or two of fun in the sun in Hawaii.

Aloha.

Slain Border Agent’s Family Gives Napolitano a Tongue Lashing: ‘Empty Words’

COULTER: SCROOGE WAS A LIBERAL. COULTER ON 'DON'T ASK DON'T TELL'


It's the Christmas season, so godless liberals are citing the Bible to demand the redistribution of income by government force. Didn't Jesus say, "Blessed are the Health and Human Services bureaucrats, for theirs is the kingdom of heaven"?

Liberals are always indignantly accusing conservatives of claiming God is on our side. What we actually say is: We're on God's side, particularly when liberals are demanding God's banishment from the public schools, abortion on demand, and taxpayer money being spent on Jesus submerged in a jar of urine and pictures of the Virgin Mary covered with pornographic photos.

But for liberals like Al Franken, it's beyond dispute that Jesus would support extending federal unemployment insurance.

This has absolutely nothing to do with the Bible, but it does nicely illustrate Shakespeare's point that the "devil can cite Scripture for his purpose."

What the Bible says about giving to the poor is: "Each of you should give what you have decided in your heart to give, not reluctantly or under compulsion, for God loves a cheerful giver." (2 Corinthians (9:7)

Being forced to pay taxes under penalty of prison is not voluntary and rarely done cheerfully. Nor do our taxes go to "the poor." They mostly go to government employees who make more money than you do.

The reason liberals love the government redistributing money is that it allows them to skip the part of charity that involves peeling the starfish off their wallets and forking over their own money. This, as we know from study after study, they cannot bear to do. (Unless they are guaranteed press conferences where they can brag about their generosity.)

Syracuse University professor Arthur Brooks' study of charitable giving in America found that conservatives give 30 percent more to charity than liberals do, despite the fact that liberals have higher incomes than conservatives.

In his book "Who Really Cares?" Brooks compared the charitable donations of religious conservatives, secular liberals, secular conservatives and "religious" liberals.

His surprising conclusion was ... Al Franken gave the most of all!

Ha ha! Just kidding. Religious conservatives, the largest group at about 20 percent of the population, gave the most to charity -- $2,367 per year, compared with $1,347 for the country at large.

Even when it comes to purely secular charities, religious conservatives give more than other Americans, which is surprising because liberals specialize in "charities" that give them a direct benefit, such as the ballet or their children's elite private schools.

Indeed, religious people, Brooks says, "are more charitable in every measurable nonreligious way."

Brooks found that conservatives donate more in time, services and even blood than other Americans, noting that if liberals and moderates gave as much blood as conservatives do, the blood supply would increase by about 45 percent.

They ought to set up blood banks at tea parties.

On average, a person who attends religious services and does not believe in the redistribution of income will give away 100 times more -- and 50 times more to secular charities -- than a person who does not attend religious services and strongly believes in the redistribution of income.

Secular liberals, the second largest group coming in at 10 percent of the population, were the whitest and richest of the four groups. (Some of you may also know them as "insufferable blowhards.") These "bleeding-heart tightwads," as New York Times columnist Nicholas Kristof calls them, were the second stingiest, just behind secular conservatives, who are mostly young, poor, cranky white guys.

Despite their wealth and advantages, secular liberals give to charity at a rate of 9 percent less than all Americans and 19 percent less than religious conservatives. They were also "significantly less likely than the population average to return excess change mistakenly given to them by a cashier." (Count Nancy Pelosi's change carefully!)

Secular liberals are, however, 90 percent more likely to give sanctimonious Senate speeches demanding the forced redistribution of income. (That's up 7 percent from last year!)

We'll review specific liberals next week.

Needless to say, "religious liberals" made up the smallest group at just 6.4 percent of the population (for more on this, see my book, "Godless").

Interestingly, religious liberals were also "most confused" of all the groups. Composed mostly of blacks and Unitarians, religious liberals made nearly as many charitable donations as religious conservatives, but presumably, the Unitarians brought down their numbers, making them second in charitable giving.

Brooks wrote that he was shocked by his conclusions because he believed liberals "genuinely cared more about others than conservatives did" -- probably because liberals are always telling us that.

So he re-ran the numbers and gathered more data, but it kept coming out the same. "In the end," he says, "I had no option but to change my views."

Every other study on the subject has produced similar results. Indeed, a Google study of philanthropy found an even greater disparity, with conservatives giving 50 percent more than liberals. The Google study showed that liberals gave more to secular causes overall, but conservatives still gave more as a percentage of their incomes.

The Catalogue for Philanthropy analyzed a decade of state and federal tax returns and found that the red states were far more generous than the blue states, with the highest percentage of tightwads living in the liberal Northeast.

In his book "Intellectuals," Paul Johnson quotes Pablo Picasso scoffing at the idea that he would give to the needy. "I'm afraid you've got it wrong," Picasso explains, "we are socialists. We don't pretend to be Christians."

Merry Christmas to all, skinflint liberals and generous Christians alike!

ANN COULTER ON 'DON'T ASK DON'T TELL'



“Fiano was, as were we, opposed to the repeal of Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell. But she’s right to call out people like the ‘expert’ commentator from the professional right who suggested that as many as half a million service members might quit as a result of repeal. And she’s right to lambaste the writer—a self-proclaimed admirer of the U.S. military—who argued that he now has no choice but to ‘actively encourage men and women to leave—in droves.’

“Fortunately, and needless to say, our men and women in uniform will ignore such ‘encouragement.’ They’re made of much sterner stuff than some of their self-proclaimed admirers seem to think…

“President Obama said last week, speaking ‘to all Americans’: ‘Your country needs you, your country wants you, and we will be honored to welcome you into the ranks of the finest military the world has ever known.’ Our fine servicemen and women won’t quit, they won’t whine, they won’t fret, and they won’t cause a scene. Conservatives owe it to them to conduct ourselves with the same composure and dignity.”

“Former United States Deputy Undersecretary of Defense Jed Babbin told TheDC that the repeal raises more questions than it answers about America’s ability to execute the War on Terror effectively.

“‘Can gays serve as military advisers to Muslims?’ he asked in an e-mail to TheDC. ‘What about Provincial Reconstruction Teams in Afghanistan? Will gays be able to be out among the Muslims and how much will that drive Muslims away from the nation-building effort?’…

“Indeed propaganda is something to keep in mind, according to Dr. Zuhdi Jasser, president and founder of the American Islamic Forum for Democracy (AIFD). Jasser told TheDC that, while the AIFD did not take a position on the repeal of DADT, there is a good probability that jihadi propagandists will likely use the presence of gays in uniform against the United States.

“‘It will be used in order to paint American secularism as against their Islamic values, so it will be no different than other stereotypes about the West –as being anti-religious, anti-Islam — that have been used in the past to feed the anti-American military propaganda,’ Jasser said, noting that the real world impact will be unknown until the policy is actually implemented.”

Via Mediaite.

Wednesday, December 22, 2010

NAIVE IDIOT: Obama 'snookered' by Russia in new arms treaty.'They got virtually everything they wanted but gave up nothing of importance to us'


'But he has a really nice suit and a great smile!' Idiots...


WASHINGTON – The lame-duck Senate voted 71-26 today to ratify President Obama's strategic arms reduction treaty with the Russians, which numerous Reagan and Bush administration defense experts say will put America at a strategic disadvantage.

The Obama administration is "intent on putting the United States out of the nuclear weapons business," said Frank Gaffney, president of the Center for Security Policy and a former acting assistant secretary of defense for security policy.

Gaffney accused Obama of following a policy of "radical denuclearization."

"Ours is the only country they can denuclearize," Gaffney lamented.

The so-called New START treaty limits each side to 1,550 strategic nuclear weapons but fails to address the massive 10-1 Russian advantage in tactical nuclear weapons. Disputes over interpretation of the treaty may allow the Russians to expand their nuclear advantage even further.

"The Russians have already said they think they can have 2,200 warheads, far more than the 1,550 they're supposed to have," said Gaffney.

Critics say the treaty poses a serious threat to U.S. security by restricting America's ability to develop and deploy missile defenses against threats posed by a number of potential foes. It also, they say, cripples American ability to verify Russian compliance with strategic arms deals.

In addition, the treaty gives the Russians the capability to quickly expand their number of deployed nuclear weapons should they decide to withdraw from the treaty, according to defense expert John Kwapisz.

"This is a bad day for the future safety of the American people," said Kwapisz, with Gaffney an organizer of the New Deterrent Working Group, a coalition of more than 30 former defense and foreign policy officials and strategic weapons experts who sent the Senate a Dec. 20 open letter opposing the treaty. Kwapisz is former executive director of the Center for Peace and Freedom.

"These were the real nuts and bolts people involved in the hands-on implementation and design of security policies," said Kwapisz of the working group, contending they are better judges of the treaty than the prominent politicians and diplomats advanced by the Obama administration to support it.

"The Russians have snookered the Obama administration," Kwapisz told WND. "They got virtually everything they wanted but gave up nothing of importance to us on verification, missile defenses and their advantage in tactical nuclear weapons." READ
MORE...

Parker: Weiner shows envy is more important than prosperity



Congressman Anthony Weiner is making a name for himself.

The New York Democrat wants taxes raised on wealthy Americans and is one of the more vocal opponents to the deal that would retain current tax rates for everyone.
"An estate tax cut for millionaires adds exactly zero jobs. A tax cut for billionaires -- virtually none," says Weiner.

But what does Weiner know about job creation, about work, about being an entrepreneur?

Looking over his resume, you see he's never held a private sector job.
Right out of college, he went to work on the staff of then-Congressmen Chuck Schumer, followed by six years serving on New York's city council, and then ran for congress in 1999, capturing the seat he currently holds.

Mr. Weiner is a politically ambitious young man who has built power and career by confiscating and redistributing other people's money.

Consider that the wealthy are that Weiner wants to punish.

Thomas Stanley and William Danko wrote a book called "The Millionaire Next Door: The Surprising Secrets of America's Wealthy".

They produced a portrait of who America's millionaires are and show that by and large these are quiet, understated, self-reliant Americans who are committed to hard work, education, and family.

Their portrait shows that 80 percent of our millionaires are first generation affluent, that less than half received a cent in inheritance funds, and only 19 percent get any income from a trust fund or estate.

Most Americans - 80 percent -- are not self employed. But of those that are, two thirds are our millionaires.

Seventy five percent of these self-employed millionaires are entrepreneurs and the remaining quarter is self-employed professionals like doctors and accounts.
These are overwhelmingly self-made individuals, by a large founders and proprietors of prosaic businesses like "welding contractors, auctioneers, rice farmers, owners of mobile-home parks, pest controllers, coin and stamp dealers and paving contractors."

Sure, we have high-profile billionaires in America. But most of America's millionaires, those whose income is in the $250,000 and above category whose taxes Weiner wants to raise, are our nation's bread and butter entrepreneurs and small business owners. READ MORE...

WHICH REPUBLICANS SOLD OUT?


With the new Republican power in Washington, it is doubly important to keep a close eye on the doings of GOP Senators and Congressmen to spot those who are straying from orthodoxy, seduced by power and the insider clubiness that characterizes Washington.

In the Lame Duck session, we want to draw attention to six Republican U.S. Senators who voted with the Democrats on a key issue. We should all bear their apostasy in mind and, in particular, make them mindful of the possibility of primary challenges to their re-nomination.

Two Senators, in particular, deserve to have primary challengers take them on in 2012 — Tennessee’s Bob Corker and Mississippi’s Thad Cochran. Both men voted for the START treaty which conceded a permanent edge in nuclear weaponry to Russia. While the Treaty provided for equal and reduced stockpiles of strategic warheads, it did nothing to address the vast piles of tactical nuclear warheads held by the Russians. The Russians have 10,000 of these battlefield nuclear weapons piled up in the stockpile while we have only a few hundred.

In addition, START’s preamble blocks the U.S. from developing missile defenses, now especially important in light of North Korea’s and Iran’s expanding capacities.

Both Corker and Cochran face re-election in 2012. They should both be challenged for the nomination by men who put our need for national security above appeasing the Russians. Having suppressed democracy, wiped out free speech, taken over all the media, nationalized their oil and energy industry, invaded Georgia, enabled the Iranian nuclear program, and tried to establish a natural gas monopoly in Europe, what else does Putin need to do before Corker and Cochran realize that appeasement won’t work?

Bob Corker’s vote for START probably stems from the insider-old boy network on the Senate Foreign Affairs Committee on which he sits. Senator Johnny Isakson of Georgia, who also voted for START, sits alongside him on the Republican minority on the committee. Led by Senator Richard Lugar, the ranking GOP member on the panel, all three voted for START. Unfortunately, Isakson is not up for re-election until 2016. When he does come up for re-election, we hope that the citizens of Georgia’s Republican Party hold him to account.

Lamar Alexander, also of Tennessee, backed START and faces re-election in 2014.

In a previous column, we called attention to the defections of Republican Senators Tom Coburn of Oklahoma and Mike Crapo of Idaho from the ranks of fiscal conservatives. Both Coburn and Crapo voted for the recommendations of the Bowles-Simpson Deficit Reduction Commission which recommended cutting the deductions for home mortgages and charitable contributions by two-thirds for most taxpayers and urged the enactment of almost $1 trillion in new taxes.

Coburn and Crapo only announced their intention to endorse the Commission report after they had been re-elected on November 2, 2010. Now they are safe in their seats until 2016. But we hope to be still writing columns by then and will remind the voters of those two conservative states how ill-served they were by their Republican senators.

So who sold out?

Thad Cochran, Mississippi
Bob Corker, Tennessee
Mike Crapo, Idaho
Tom Coburn, Oklahoma
Lamar Alexander, Tennessee
Johnny Isakson, Georgia

Let’s remember.

Please let them hear from you by phone and/or fax. Their information is below.

Thad Cocheran, Mississippi

Washington Office
United States Senate
113 Dirksen Senate Office Building
Washington, D.C. 20510-2402
202-224-5054 / 202-224-5054

Jackson Office
190 East Capitol St.
Suite 550
Jackson, Mississippi 39201
601-965-4459 / 601-965-4459

Bob Corker, Tennessee

Washington, D.C.
United States Senate
Dirksen Senate Office Building
SD-185
Washington, DC 20510
Main: 202-224-3344 / 202-224-3344
Fax: 202-228-0566

Memphis
100 Peabody Place, Suite 1125
Memphis, TN 38103
Main: 901-683-1910 / 901-683-1910
Fax: 901-575-3528

Mike Crapo, Idaho

Washington, DC
239 Dirksen Senate Building
Washington, DC 20510
Phone: (202) 224-6142
Fax: (202) 228-1375

Idaho State Office
251 East Front Street
Suite 205
Boise, ID 83702
Phone: (208) 334-1776
Fax: (208) 334-9044

Tom Coburn, Oklahoma

Washington D.C.:
172 Russell Senate Office Bldg.
Washington, DC 20510
Main: 202-224-5754
Fax: 202-224-6008

Tulsa:
1800 South Baltimore
Suite 800
Tulsa, OK 74119
Main: 918-581-7651
Fax: 918-581-7195

Oklahoma City:
100 North Broadway
Suite 1820
Oklahoma City, OK 73102
Main: 405-231-4941
Fax: 405-231-5051

Lamar Alexander, Tennessee

Washington Office
455 Dirksen Senate Office Building
Washington, DC 20510
Phone: (202) 224-4944 / (202) 224-4944
Fax: (202) 228-3398
TTY: (202) 224-1546

Memphis Office
Clifford Davis-Odell Horton Federal Building
167 North Main Street, #1068
Memphis, TN 38103
Phone: (901) 544-4224 / (901) 544-4224
Fax: (901) 544-4227

Johnny Isakson, Georgia

United States Senate
120 Russell Senate Office Building
Washington, DC 20510
Tel: (202) 224-3643 / (202) 224-3643
Fax: (202) 228-0724

One Overton Park, Suite 970
3625 Cumberland Blvd
Atlanta, GA 30339
Tel: (770) 661-0999 / (770) 661-0999
Fax: (770) 661-0768

RUBBER BROTHER: Progressive Vision of Borderless US: Rep and "Fake Muslim" Keith Ellison — ‘God Willing…Border Will Become an Irrelevancy’



Rep. Keith Ellison is simply an irresponsible, reckless, dangerous, anti-American, ignorant racist 'piece of garbage' congressman. He converted to Islam in college becoming another of many 'fake' Muslims in America, but we all know he's just another 'rubber brother.'

He believes in social justice and votes with Nancy Pelosi most of the time. He also shares the same vision of America as Louis Farrakhan does. While attending law school, Ellison wrote several articles in support of Louis Farrakhan of the Nation of Islam.

He's also a very dangerous person to have serving in congress. How does a man who despises the constitution and America get elected to the U.S house of representatives? How did we allow this dirtbag progressive to swear in on the Koran?

Keith Ellison has to be defeated. America's first Muslim U.S. congressman does not represent Minnesota. Keith Ellison takes his orders from Islamists.

BLANKET PARTY: Barney Frank: Not Allowing Gays and Straights to Shower Together is ‘Discrimination’



Look for an increase of 'blanket parties' thanks to DADT. Thanks democrats, that's all we need in the military; more assaults, more frivolous lawsuits, more division, more wasteful spending on dorms, showers, base housing, sensitivity training etc..
SEE THE VIDEO HERE
Not allowing gay military personnel to shower with straight military peronnel would be “discrimination.” That’s the position of Rep. Barney Frank (D-MA), an openly gay member of Congress who is a proponent of banishing the military’s “Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell” policy.

Frank told CNSNews.com that the idea that people might be concerned over gays and straights showering together, and the possible disruption it could case, is a “silly issue”:

"To accept the principle that homosexuals can’t shower with other people is a degree of discrimination that goes far beyond this. We don’t get ourselves dry cleaned. We tend to take showers when we go to the gym; when we play sports,” Frank said.

Tuesday, December 21, 2010

WATCH: Beck exposes the radicals and revolutionaries that have an impact on our current administration....



A Glenn Beck ‘crash course’ on radicals and revolutionaries. From George Soros to Cloward & Piven- if you’re new to the program or have friends that are still (still??) on the fence about whether our country is in serious trouble, this episode is a great place to start. Tonight, the history of revolutions- and what are the warning signs that a revolution is about to occur? We’ll also talk about the influence of radical revolutionaries that have an impact on our current administration. Plus, how our kids are taught to revere revolutionaries like Che’ and Mao- and not Adams or Washington.

See more at WatchGlennBeck.Com

SHOCK VIDEO: Obama's Top Intelligence Official Unfamiliar with London Terror Arrests...



At 3:50 of this video, your jaw will drop!

A continuing conversation with the three stooges, Janet Napolitano, James Clapper and John Brennan.